Skip to main content

Robbing The Poor To Feed The Rich?

Now that cuts in spending seem to be on the agenda of all the main political parties, the big questions still to be answered are: how much? And where will the axe fall?

According to a recent poll by Ipsos MORI, published by the BBC (http://bit.ly/d168R), the most popular candidate with most people is overseas aid.

That’s not really surprising. It’s understandable that during severe financial crisis most people want our government to look after our own affairs first. Charity, as the saying goes, begins at home. But is it really right for the poorest nations of the world to be penalised for a crisis that was brought on by the rich?

The developing world already spends $1.3 on debt repayment for every $1 it receives in grants (Source: World Centric, http://bit.ly/b5C7f). Every day at least $100 million flows from the poor of the world into the pockets of the rich. Existing problems like drought and famine will not go away just because there is a worldwide recession, and the poor are more deeply affected than the rich. If you are a subsistence farmer and the market price for your crop falls, it doesn’t mean that you can’t buy the new tele you had your eye on. That was never an option anyway. But it might mean that your kids starve to death.

Contrary to popular belief, the sums involved in overseas aid are vanishingly small compared with the overall cost of the crisis. The money spent by the UK government to prop up the very financial system that maintains most of the world in poverty - £218 billion pounds so far – is over 100 times the entire GNP of some of the poorest nations, such as Guyana and Burundi (£2 billion each).

Given that financial inequality is also a recognised driver behind some rather negative social trends, such as economic migration and terrorism, cutting overseas aid would be a very short-sighted and rather petty response by a relatively wealthy and hopefully civilised nation to a problem that is, after all, mostly of our own making.

Comments

David Goater said…
Wow... people can be so selfish!!
peyton said…
Interesting post with manageable stats. A good point well made.

Popular posts from this blog

A God Who Reaches Out

Years ago I was guest speaker at a conference of a group of churches in a remote part of SW Uganda. One of the delegates I met there had walked for a couple of days to attend, sleeping out in the bush under the stars, and drinking water from whatever muddy pool he came across. I've been back several times since, but I've never forgotten the remarkable dedication of that one individual. It's been widely acknowledged, and I've written here previously, that the universe seems to speak to us of an architect - a creator of everything we see around us. If that's true, it would require similar dedication on their part for us to have any chance of knowing and understanding them. The innumerable religions and concepts of God that we find around the world today, not to mention throughout history, and the many other theories of origins, are testimony to this. Left to ourselves we are incapable of figuring out definitively, to everyone's agreement and satisfaction, who or w...

God the Omnipotent and Stupid?

One of the questions you will often hear raised about God goes along the lines, "If there is an omnipotent God why doesn't he do X?", where X may be anything from stopping wars or preventing earthquakes to curing cancer. Often there is a deeply personal reason behind the question, which makes a purely rational answer wholly unsatisfying. All the same, it's a rational question and some kind of rational answer is deserved. But two things make it a complex question to which no simple answer is possible. One is the extraordinary diversity of the things that 'X' may represent, all of them having different causes with different and completely unrelated solutions. The other is the sole focus on God's omnipotence. Because God, if he exists, must be so much more than just that. There is an old philosophical conundrum on the same subject, of the kind that philosphers love to pose and to ponder. If God is omnipotent, can he create an object so massive that he himself...