Skip to main content

Torchwood, Faith and Little Green Men

Being a bit of a sci fi fan, I did enjoy last week’s extended Torchwood story. But there was one scene that really did stretch my imagination to breaking point. It was nothing to do with alien invasions or rifts in time and space. It was Gwen’s conversation about someone’s Christian friend who lost their faith on account of the appearance of aliens.

The more standard and fanciful sci-fi fare I can take in my stride, because it exists purely in the realm of the imagination. Bits of it will probably find their way into the real world at some time in the future. But for the time being, I don’t need to relate it to any kind of reality. Faith, on the other hand, is something I live with and experience daily. And frankly, the idea that the mere discovery of alien life would shake a convinced Christian from their faith I just found a bit hard to swallow.

So the Bible doesn’t mention aliens. So what? It doesn’t mention chicken tikka massala either; but and that doesn’t mean I’m going to lose my faith if a plate of the stuff is shoved in front of me.

So the Bible says that man was made ‘in the image of God’? Big deal. In what way does that preclude other forms of life? Even other forms that also express the same image, in different ways, and on different planets?

It’s true that potential interplanetary contact is not exactly a hot topic of debate in churches. But theologians haven’t completely ignored the subject, either. C S Lewis’s sci fi classic, ‘Out of the Silent Planet’, was one remarkable and imaginative exploration of the possibilities for alien life within a completely orthodox Christian framework. And that’s just one example.

There may or may not be intelligent life on other planets, and we may or may not make contact one day. But whether we do or we don’t, it won’t make the slightest difference to the Christian message and what it means for mankind, on our planet, now and in the future. And it wouldn't represent any kind of threat to the faith of Christians, or people of any religion.

So I’m sorry Torchwood, but for this particular fan you stretched the boundaries of credulity just a bit too far this time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jealousy or Generosity - Which One Wins?

I was struck just recently by the contrast between two particular people who met Jesus, and his response to them. One was a prosperous official who had acquired many possessions. Jesus' advice to him was, "Sell everything you have and give to the poor" (see my post of 27th May for a take on what that might mean). This man could have done so much to help those less fortunate than himself, but when Jesus suggested doing so he went away sad. He was far too jealous of his own wealth to consider sharing it. I would like to think, after he had time to reconsider, he was at least motivated to do more than before. But we don't know. His contact with Jesus and the gospel sources seems to end there. The other person was a poor widow who literally put her last two pennies into the temple offering (Luke 21:1-4). Of her Jesus said, "She, out of her poverty, put in everything—all she had to live on". She had no way of knowing how her tiny offering would be used. It might

The Birth of Jesus - a Smoking Gun From History?

Some say that Jesus of Nazareth is just a myth and a legend. Others, a historical figure who was born in Bethlehem, probably around 5 BC.  Wouldn't it be great if we could find his birth certificate and settle the matter once and for all?! Oddly enough, it's not such a daft idea. The Roman Empire was assidious about keeping records, and the birth of Jesus would certainly have been noted in its archives. Unfortunately, between the sackings of Rome and Constantinople almost all of them were lost. That wasn't always the case, though. Several times in the first three centuries AD the Empire made concerted efforts to erase the story of Jesus from history. For all this time the records were available - as the Christian apologist, Justin Martyr, was at pains to point out in an open ketter to the Emperor: "Now there is a village in the land of the Jews, thirty-five stadia from Jerusalem, in which Jesus Christ was born, as you can ascertain also from the registers of the taxing

God the Omnipotent and Stupid?

One of the questions you will often hear raised about God goes along the lines, "If there is an omnipotent God why doesn't he do X?", where X may be anything from stopping wars or preventing earthquakes to curing cancer. Often there is a deeply personal reason behind the question, which makes a purely rational answer wholly unsatisfying. All the same, it's a rational question and some kind of rational answer is deserved. But two things make it a complex question to which no simple answer is possible. One is the extraordinary diversity of the things that 'X' may represent, all of them having different causes with different and completely unrelated solutions. The other is the sole focus on God's omnipotence. Because God, if he exists, must be so much more than just that. There is an old philosophical conundrum on the same subject, of the kind that philosphers love to pose and to ponder. If God is omnipotent, can he create an object so massive that he himself