Skip to main content

A God of Science

As a Christian with a scientific background, it always saddens me when people find ways to create or imagine conflict between faith in God and science.

If it's true that God created the universe, then he invented science itself. The very idea of a universe that follows a consistent set of laws was his. And a good thing, too. Imagine a universe where random and unpredictable events were commonplace. Where you could pour water into a glass and, when you drink it, it might become bleach. Or where your bedroom might unexpectedly turn upside down while you were asleep in bed. Not a universe any of us would like to live in!

Some Christians see a conflict with science at the very start of the Bible, in Genesis chapter 1. The seven days of creation, interpreted literally, contradict the assertion that the universe evolved slowly over billions of years - something that science claims as fact supported by evidence. 

So is science mistaken? Is the Bible in error? Or is a literal reading simply the wrong reading in this case?

When we view the Bible - a collection of ancient, Middle Eastern writings - through our modern and literalistic European lens, there's an obvious risk of misunderstanding. So, when it comes to debatable interpretations, it's surely sensible to keep an open mind and be persuadable. As Oliver Cromwell wrote to the Scottish covenanters, to 'consider it possible that you might be wrong'.

As long ago as the third century CE, Augustine of Hippo reached the same conclusion:

'In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received. In such cases, we should not rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further progress in the search for truth justly undermines this position, we too fall with it.' ('The Literal Meaning of Genesis').

If facts appear that call into question our interpretation of the Bible, we should examine our interpretation at least as critically as we do the facts. 

The Bible itself teaches that genuine faith has no need to deny facts. Abraham, 'without weakening in his faith, faced the fact that his body was as good as dead... and that Sarah’s womb was also dead' (Romans 4: 19). Jesus said, 'If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.' (John 8: 31-32).

If we need to deny the facts to hang on to our interpretation, we've lost sight of the truth. We are shouting to become imprisoned in a big hole of our own digging.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robbing The Poor To Feed The Rich?

Now that cuts in spending seem to be on the agenda of all the main political parties, the big questions still to be answered are: how much? And where will the axe fall? According to a recent poll by Ipsos MORI, published by the BBC ( http://bit.ly/d168R ), the most popular candidate with most people is overseas aid. That’s not really surprising. It’s understandable that during severe financial crisis most people want our government to look after our own affairs first. Charity, as the saying goes, begins at home. But is it really right for the poorest nations of the world to be penalised for a crisis that was brought on by the rich? The developing world already spends $1.3 on debt repayment for every $1 it receives in grants (Source: World Centric, http://bit.ly/b5C7f ). Every day at least $100 million flows from the poor of the world into the pockets of the rich. Existing problems like drought and famine will not go away just because there is a worldwide recession, and the poor are mo...

The Shadow Of The Crusades

Like many others I watched this week's handover ceremony in Basra with some relief. Hopefully it's the beginning of the end of a venture that most people in the UK would rather forget. But relief gave way to frustration as I listened to the closing prayers, and realised with fresh understanding why the Muslim world still cannot forgive or forget the Crusades. It's one thing to have chaplains provide support and comfort to ordinary soldiers, who after all are only doing the job that their political masters have dictated. But against the backdrop of our history, it seems insanely foolish to include a religious element in a televised event associated with such a contentious war as the one in Iraq. The marriage of religion and state has never born palatable fruit. When clerics have political power, the wrong kind of people become clerics, for the wrong reasons. That much is clear from European history, and is still apparent in parts of the Islamic world today. Almost all religi...

A God Who Reaches Out

Years ago I was guest speaker at a conference of a group of churches in a remote part of SW Uganda. One of the delegates I met there had walked for a couple of days to attend, sleeping out in the bush under the stars, and drinking water from whatever muddy pool he came across. I've been back several times since, but I've never forgotten the remarkable dedication of that one individual. It's been widely acknowledged, and I've written here previously, that the universe seems to speak to us of an architect - a creator of everything we see around us. If that's true, it would require similar dedication on their part for us to have any chance of knowing and understanding them. The innumerable religions and concepts of God that we find around the world today, not to mention throughout history, and the many other theories of origins, are testimony to this. Left to ourselves we are incapable of figuring out definitively, to everyone's agreement and satisfaction, who or w...