Skip to main content

Are these the last days?

I'm always a bit doubtful when I hear Christians predicting that Christ is going to return soon. After all, they've been saying that for centuries. Sure there are signs that we are in the 'last days'. That's no surprise. The coming of the Holy Spirit is recorded in Acts 2 as a fulfilment of the prophecy of Joel, and that was a 'last days' prophecy. So, we have been living in the last days for 2000 years - and who's to say for how much longer?

Maybe the real question is, 'Are these the last last days?' Are we near the time of the end?

We can look to biblical prophecy for an answer, but it's generally risky to interpret prophecy out of its context. And by definition, the context of the last last prophecies will only appear in the last last days, when they are about to be fulfilled. Until then, Christian 'teachers' will continue to make a name for themselves with weird and not-very-wonderful interpretations of the more obscure revelations. (I remember listening to one brother preach for an hour on how Russia was going to invade Israel for its oranges!)

That's why we must not rely solely on particular interpretations of Scripture. We need to ask some other questions as well. Like, what is the Holy Spirit saying in our generation? What are the prophets saying today? And we need to look for fig-tree signs - things that are happening in our world today. And like the people on the Day of Pentecost, we need to ask 'what does this mean?' And just as important, 'what then should we do?'.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robbing The Poor To Feed The Rich?

Now that cuts in spending seem to be on the agenda of all the main political parties, the big questions still to be answered are: how much? And where will the axe fall? According to a recent poll by Ipsos MORI, published by the BBC ( http://bit.ly/d168R ), the most popular candidate with most people is overseas aid. That’s not really surprising. It’s understandable that during severe financial crisis most people want our government to look after our own affairs first. Charity, as the saying goes, begins at home. But is it really right for the poorest nations of the world to be penalised for a crisis that was brought on by the rich? The developing world already spends $1.3 on debt repayment for every $1 it receives in grants (Source: World Centric, http://bit.ly/b5C7f ). Every day at least $100 million flows from the poor of the world into the pockets of the rich. Existing problems like drought and famine will not go away just because there is a worldwide recession, and the poor are mo...

The Ordinariness of Faith

I hit some traffic last Saturday. I don’t mean literally hit, but I do mean traffic. I was driving back from Barnes to Twickenham when suddenly the traffic ahead ground almost to a standstill. Seeing how long and slow moving the queue was, I took a leap of faith. I took a blind left turn and switched on the satnav. Without really knowing where I was going, I followed the satnav to Roehampton, where I hit another major jam. Fortunately on the satnav screen I noticed a side road heading towards Richmond Park. So I swung off-piste again and drove through the park, missing the traffic and enjoying an uninterrupted drive home. The leap of faith paid off.  How is it, I wonder, that some people can write off faith as some sort of mindless and mystical belief, and despise it as unreasonable? They reduce it to something ethereal and strange, and talk about ‘people of faith’ as though there is some other group of people who are not ‘of faith’. And yet we all exercise faith in very ordinary...

God the Omnipotent and Stupid?

One of the questions you will often hear raised about God goes along the lines, "If there is an omnipotent God why doesn't he do X?", where X may be anything from stopping wars or preventing earthquakes to curing cancer. Often there is a deeply personal reason behind the question, which makes a purely rational answer wholly unsatisfying. All the same, it's a rational question and some kind of rational answer is deserved. But two things make it a complex question to which no simple answer is possible. One is the extraordinary diversity of the things that 'X' may represent, all of them having different causes with different and completely unrelated solutions. The other is the sole focus on God's omnipotence. Because God, if he exists, must be so much more than just that. There is an old philosophical conundrum on the same subject, of the kind that philosphers love to pose and to ponder. If God is omnipotent, can he create an object so massive that he himself...